Top-rated concrete mudjacking pros.

Get matched with top concrete mudjacking pros in Rudolph, WI

Enter your zip and get matched with up to 5 pros

Need a pro for your concrete mudjacking project in Rudolph, WI?

Select your specific project to find the pro for you.

Verified Reviews for Concrete Mudjacking pros in Rudolph, WI

*The Angi rating for Concrete Mudjacking companies in Rudolph, WI is a rating based on verified reviews from our community of homeowners who have used these pros to meet their Concrete Mudjacking needs.

*The HomeAdvisor rating for Concrete Mudjacking companies in Rudolph, WI is a rating based on verified reviews from our community of homeowners who have used these pros to meet their Concrete Mudjacking needs.

Last update on March 31, 2026

Find Concrete mudjacking pros in Rudolph

Avatar for Sure-Dry, LLC
Sure-Dry, LLC
3.8(
19
)

Serving Rudolph, WI and surrounding areas

Approved

In business since 1994

Free estimates

Warranties offered

"Mike is great at the planning and cost estimate. He gets right to work and works efficiently, finishing in less time and at a lower cost than I had expected. And he does great work! I now have a well insulated garage, and can't thank Mike enough."
Sump Pump Installation
Waterproofing Basement Walls
Egress Window
Egress Window
Concrete Resurfacing

+18

Response time5 hrs
93 neighbors recently requested a quote
Recommended by54%of homeowners
Request Quote
Concrete Mudjacking questions, answered by experts

Generally speaking, push piers—or steel piers—are the best option for underpinning, as they reach down to solid bedrock to find support for your foundation rather than relying on soil, which could be subject to the same issues as the soil directly below your foundation. However, the best underpinning method for your home depends on your location, how far down the bedrock is, and the type of soil in your area. Helical piers are usually the best option for sandy soil or in areas where the bedrock is too deep to use steel piers.

Mudjacking can be an expensive foundation repair process, but in many cases, it’s well worth the investment. This is especially true if you’re lifting a portion of sunken foundation slab back into place. In that case, mudjacking can help avoid major structural damage and even home collapse by restoring the integrity of your structure with minimally invasive procedures. Mudjacking a concrete patio, walkway, or sidewalk can be worthwhile because it removes tripping hazards and makes your outdoor area more aesthetically appealing.

A good slump height really depends on the project, but there is a use for nearly all slump levels. For example, low slumps are best in projects that require structure, such as curbs and roads. High slumps often require additional reinforcement, but they flow more freely into hard-to-reach spaces.

On average, a mudjacking repair lasts between five and 10 years, though it can sometimes last for well beyond a decade under ideal conditions. Its longevity depends heavily on several factors, including the condition of the underlying soil, environmental conditions like freeze/thaw cycles and erosion, and whether the root cause of the sinking, such as drainage issues, is resolved. Because it doesn't always fix the underlying problem of loose soil, mudjacking is often considered a temporary solution. Proper maintenance and evaluation can help extend its lifespan.

There is no real alternative to underpinning, although mudjacking and polyjacking are other repair methods that can add support from underneath your foundation. Rather than placing supportive piers under your structure, these involve pumping a material under your slab to lift a sunken section back into its original position. Polyjacking, in particular, is sometimes a suitable solution for stabilization issues under slab foundations, but underpinning is often accepted as the best and most permanent solution.

The Rudolph, WI homeowners’ guide to concrete mudjacking services

From average costs to expert advice, get all the answers you need to get your job done.

See all articles