Top-rated concrete mudjacking pros.

Get matched with top concrete mudjacking pros in Avoca, WI

Enter your zip and get matched with up to 5 pros

Need a pro for your concrete mudjacking project in Avoca, WI?

Select your specific project to find the pro for you.

Verified Reviews for Concrete Mudjacking pros in Avoca, WI

*The Angi rating for Concrete Mudjacking companies in Avoca, WI is a rating based on verified reviews from our community of homeowners who have used these pros to meet their Concrete Mudjacking needs.

*The HomeAdvisor rating for Concrete Mudjacking companies in Avoca, WI is a rating based on verified reviews from our community of homeowners who have used these pros to meet their Concrete Mudjacking needs.

Last update on February 21, 2026

Find Concrete mudjacking pros in Avoca

Orth Concrete LLC
New to Angi

Serving Avoca, WI and surrounding areas

In business since 2023

Free estimates

Credit card accepted

Orth Concrete does flatwork mainly (sidewalks, steps, driveways, decorative, floors, and patios), but we also do retaining walls and foundations.\n\nOrth Concrete will give you top quality craftsmanship. We will always strive to be the best.\n\nAs the owner of Orth Concrete I have been in the concrete industry for 10 years. Concrete is my passion and I always provide quality work.

Request Quote
Concrete Mudjacking questions, answered by experts

Polyjacking and mudjacking can both be effective solutions for sinking concrete, but they have key differences. Polyjacking, which uses expanding polyurethane foam, is often considered a better option because the foam is significantly lighter than the cementitious material used for mudjacking. This reduced weight puts less pressure on the underlying soil and lowers the risk of future sinking. Polyjacking is suitable for any sinking concrete slab, while mudjacking is typically only recommended for non-structural concrete, such as sidewalks, patios, pool decks, and driveways. The primary drawback of polyjacking is its cost, which can be up to four times higher than mudjacking—as much as $25 per square foot compared to a maximum of about $6 per square foot for mudjacking.

A good slump height really depends on the project, but there is a use for nearly all slump levels. For example, low slumps are best in projects that require structure, such as curbs and roads. High slumps often require additional reinforcement, but they flow more freely into hard-to-reach spaces.

Address drainage issues, avoid heavy loads, and seal cracks to prevent future settling.

Trenching and boring are two distinct methods for installing underground utilities. Trenching involves digging a channel using equipment like an excavator, trencher, backhoe, or shovel. While it is a simpler process, it causes significant disruption to the surface, landscaping, and surrounding ecosystems.

Boring, also known as directional boring, is a less invasive alternative that uses a drill to create a tunnel for utility lines without disturbing the surface. This method is more precise and is ideal for installations that need to go underneath buildings, roads, or bodies of water. Although boring is less disruptive, it is generally more expensive than trenching.

Yes, expanding foam (also known as polyurethane foam) can lift concrete. This approach, called polyjacking, involves injecting the foam rather than concrete slurry to fill voids and raise the concrete slab back into place. It’s often faster and requires smaller drill holes than traditional mudjacking, though it may come at a higher cost. Some contractors also prefer polyjacking over mudjacking for more damaged and delicate slabs.

The Avoca, WI homeowners’ guide to concrete mudjacking services

From average costs to expert advice, get all the answers you need to get your job done.

See all articles

What do you need done? We’ll find top pros.
  • 🌱 "Mow a small front yard"
  • 🛠 "Fix a leaking pipe under the sink"
  • 🏠 "Repair shingles on an asphalt roof"