Top-rated concrete mudjacking pros.

Get matched with top concrete mudjacking pros in Ackerman, MS

Enter your zip and get matched with up to 5 pros

Need a pro for your concrete mudjacking project in Ackerman, MS?

Select your specific project to find the pro for you.

Find Concrete mudjacking pros in Ackerman

Avatar for Redeemers Group
Redeemers Group
4.5(
104
)

Serving Ackerman, MS and surrounding areas

In business since 2007

Free estimates

Emergency services offered

"This is my second time to use Redeemers group for this problem. The first one worked so well I went with the again. They are efficient and explained everything I needed to know before they left."
Additional Photos
Additional Photos
Additional Photos
Additional Photos
Additional Photos

+14

Recommended by91%of homeowners
D's Concrete Works
New to Angi

Serving Ackerman, MS and surrounding areas

In business since 2001

D's Concrete Works has over 19 years experience in the field. We pride ourselves on striving to complete your project on schedule and work hard to get the quality you need the first time around. D's Concrete Works provides free estimates. We also want you to know that our project motto is- "Big or Small we do them all!" D's Concrete Works looks forward to meeting with you and assisting with each and every concrete project you have for your home.

Concrete Mudjacking questions, answered by experts

Polyjacking and mudjacking can both be effective solutions for sinking concrete, but they have key differences. Polyjacking, which uses expanding polyurethane foam, is often considered a better option because the foam is significantly lighter than the cementitious material used for mudjacking. This reduced weight puts less pressure on the underlying soil and lowers the risk of future sinking. Polyjacking is suitable for any sinking concrete slab, while mudjacking is typically only recommended for non-structural concrete, such as sidewalks, patios, pool decks, and driveways. The primary drawback of polyjacking is its cost, which can be up to four times higher than mudjacking—as much as $25 per square foot compared to a maximum of about $6 per square foot for mudjacking.

Concrete leveling is not typically covered by insurance. In some cases where the shifting concrete is caused by a natural disaster or storm, you may be able to file an insurance claim if your policy specifically covers those circumstances. In most cases, though, you’ll pay out-of-pocket for concrete leveling.

Trenching and boring are two distinct methods for installing underground utilities. Trenching involves digging a channel using equipment like an excavator, trencher, backhoe, or shovel. While it is a simpler process, it causes significant disruption to the surface, landscaping, and surrounding ecosystems.

Boring, also known as directional boring, is a less invasive alternative that uses a drill to create a tunnel for utility lines without disturbing the surface. This method is more precise and is ideal for installations that need to go underneath buildings, roads, or bodies of water. Although boring is less disruptive, it is generally more expensive than trenching.

Polyjacking can be a permanent solution to sunken concrete if you also address the underlying issue—like poor drainage—at the same time. The polyurethane material itself can last as long as or even outlast the concrete you’re lifting it with. Your sunken concrete issue will likely return if you don’t couple polyjacking with proper drainage to prevent future soil movement and sinking.

A good slump height really depends on the project, but there is a use for nearly all slump levels. For example, low slumps are best in projects that require structure, such as curbs and roads. High slumps often require additional reinforcement, but they flow more freely into hard-to-reach spaces.

The Ackerman, MS homeowners’ guide to concrete mudjacking services

From average costs to expert advice, get all the answers you need to get your job done.