Top-rated concrete mudjacking pros.

Get matched with top concrete mudjacking pros in Crawford, MS

Enter your zip and get matched with up to 5 pros

Need a pro for your concrete mudjacking project in Crawford, MS?

Select your specific project to find the pro for you.

Find Concrete mudjacking pros in Crawford

D's Concrete Works
New to Angi

Serving Crawford, MS and surrounding areas

In business since 2001

D's Concrete Works has over 19 years experience in the field. We pride ourselves on striving to complete your project on schedule and work hard to get the quality you need the first time around. D's Concrete Works provides free estimates. We also want you to know that our project motto is- "Big or Small we do them all!" D's Concrete Works looks forward to meeting with you and assisting with each and every concrete project you have for your home.

Concrete Mudjacking questions, answered by experts

Trenching and boring are two distinct methods for installing underground utilities. Trenching involves digging a channel using equipment like an excavator, trencher, backhoe, or shovel. While it is a simpler process, it causes significant disruption to the surface, landscaping, and surrounding ecosystems.

Boring, also known as directional boring, is a less invasive alternative that uses a drill to create a tunnel for utility lines without disturbing the surface. This method is more precise and is ideal for installations that need to go underneath buildings, roads, or bodies of water. Although boring is less disruptive, it is generally more expensive than trenching.

Yes, expanding foam (also known as polyurethane foam) can lift concrete. This approach, called polyjacking, involves injecting the foam rather than concrete slurry to fill voids and raise the concrete slab back into place. It’s often faster and requires smaller drill holes than traditional mudjacking, though it may come at a higher cost. Some contractors also prefer polyjacking over mudjacking for more damaged and delicate slabs.

Polyjacking and mudjacking can both be effective solutions for sinking concrete, but they have key differences. Polyjacking, which uses expanding polyurethane foam, is often considered a better option because the foam is significantly lighter than the cementitious material used for mudjacking. This reduced weight puts less pressure on the underlying soil and lowers the risk of future sinking. Polyjacking is suitable for any sinking concrete slab, while mudjacking is typically only recommended for non-structural concrete, such as sidewalks, patios, pool decks, and driveways. The primary drawback of polyjacking is its cost, which can be up to four times higher than mudjacking—as much as $25 per square foot compared to a maximum of about $6 per square foot for mudjacking.

Common issues with concrete that may require professional repair or resurfacing include cracks, spalling, uneven surfaces, and weather damage.

The polyurethane used for polyjacking will expand and cure in 15 to 30 minutes. After that point, your slab will be safe to walk on and even drive on in the case of a sidewalk or concrete driveway. Double-check with your concrete lifting specialist to confirm a curing timeline, as products can differ.

The Crawford, MS homeowners’ guide to concrete mudjacking services

From average costs to expert advice, get all the answers you need to get your job done.