Get matched with top residential design pros in Claypool, AZ

"First things first, I’m very happy and impressed with the quality of work done! It surpassed my expectations! I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend this company to anyone! Lester is very professional and friendly! They got the work done a lot faster than I thought as well! If you’re thinking about using Legacy Bath LLC for your bathroom remodel, good choice cause you won’t be disappointed!! Two thumbs up Lester, great job!! I’ll definitely be letting anyone I know that’s looking to get their bathroom remodeled to call Legacy Bath LLC!! "

"Wonderful. So happy with the results. I will definitely use him for future projects"

"I had the absolute pleasure of working with Diego today to get a new roof through DaBella, and I couldn’t be more impressed. From the start, Diego was incredibly patient, taking the time to walk me through every step of the process and answer all of my questions—no matter how small. What really stood out to me was how knowledgeable he was. He explained everything in a way that made sense and never made me feel rushed or pressured. On top of that, Diego came across as genuinely honest and trustworthy, which made a huge difference in my decision. You can tell he truly cares about helping people and doing right by his customers. If you’re thinking about getting work done on your home, ask for Diego—you’ll be in great hands!"

"Stronghold Remodeling did a fantastic job! I loved the attention to detail and the quality of work. A very pleasant young man to have working in my home for several days."

"My husband and I met with ACE Design and Drafting (ACE) in August 2023 to review the drawings we had prepared and conduct an interview regarding skills, experience, and process in preparing the plans. As a result of the interview, in August 2023 we entered into an agreement for ACE to prepare building ready plans for our project. The estimate to complete the plans was 3 months. Although our experience with ACE began as amiable, it slowly deteriorated to less than satisfactory. Our verbal phone communication and interaction with ACE soured, and we were no longer able to communicate/interact with ACE verbally over the phone, only by email. Unfortunately, communication with ACE through email did not improve. Our communication issues or lack of communication with and from ACE caused a considerable delay of the submittal of our plans to the County. They were not able to be submitted to the County for initial review until February 2024, nearly six (6) months after entering into the agreement with ACE. We experienced unfavorable interactions with ACE which are noted below. · ACE misplaced the drawings we provided. As we did not have a second copy of the drawings (our mistake), this delayed ACE in preparing the plans. We were in California, so it was necessary to travel to Lake Havasu City, Arizona and assist ACE in locating the drawings in the office. · The plans were submitted to Mohave County (County) for review and the County noted various corrections/redlines were required. ACE was contacted by letter which detailed the redlines needed for the house and shop. Per the County, ACE did not make all the required corrections/redlines (although our agreement states required corrections will be made when ordered by the County). The County representative was very helpful and was able to make the remaining required corrections/redlines as noted below. o House § Correction requested - Wall bracing for this structure does not meet minimum of code. Please revise. (Ref. IRC 2018 R602.10) · This was as a result of stucco vs metal siding. The correction from wording of stucco to metal siding was noted on the plans, however, the legend which showed wall board was being used was incorrect as was the use of the wall board legend icon (a 3 in a triangle) noted around the exterior of the structure. As our home would have metal siding, wall board is not required. However, sheathing (a 2 in a triangle) is required on the entire exterior of structure. The County made the correction by striking through the “wall board” legend icon and replacing in red ink the “sheathing” legend icon. o Shop § Correction requested -Header over garage door fails loading. Please revise. (Ref. IRC 2018 R301.1) · The plans show a correction of a “4x12 header”; however, in this situation a 6x12 header was required. The County made the correction by striking through “4x12 header” and replacing in red ink “6x12 header”."