Top-rated concrete mudjacking pros.

Get matched with top concrete mudjacking pros in Culbertson, NE

Enter your zip and get matched with up to 5 pros

Need a pro for your concrete mudjacking project in Culbertson, NE?

Select your specific project to find the pro for you.

Verified Reviews for Concrete Mudjacking pros in Culbertson, NE

*The Angi rating for Concrete Mudjacking companies in Culbertson, NE is a rating based on verified reviews from our community of homeowners who have used these pros to meet their Concrete Mudjacking needs.

*The HomeAdvisor rating for Concrete Mudjacking companies in Culbertson, NE is a rating based on verified reviews from our community of homeowners who have used these pros to meet their Concrete Mudjacking needs.

Last update on May 17, 2025

Find Concrete mudjacking pros in Culbertson

Avatar for Tillotson Enterprises, Inc.
Tillotson Enterprises, Inc.
5.0(
1
)

Serving Culbertson, NE and surrounding areas

In business since 1997

Free estimates

Credit card accepted

"They did a really good job. They were very knowledgeable and explained what they were going to do. They were very professional. I highly recommend them."
Finished photo
After application of Top coat
Kearney Crime Lab
Roof after polyurethane foam & base being appl
Edge work

+8

Response time1 day
Response rate96%
Recommended by100%of homeowners
Request Quote
Concrete Mudjacking questions, answered by experts

Polyjacking and mudjacking can both be effective solutions for sinking concrete, but they have key differences. Polyjacking, which uses expanding polyurethane foam, is often considered a better option because the foam is significantly lighter than the cementitious material used for mudjacking. This reduced weight puts less pressure on the underlying soil and lowers the risk of future sinking. Polyjacking is suitable for any sinking concrete slab, while mudjacking is typically only recommended for non-structural concrete, such as sidewalks, patios, pool decks, and driveways. The primary drawback of polyjacking is its cost, which can be up to four times higher than mudjacking—as much as $25 per square foot compared to a maximum of about $6 per square foot for mudjacking.

Trenching and boring are two distinct methods for installing underground utilities. Trenching involves digging a channel using equipment like an excavator, trencher, backhoe, or shovel. While it is a simpler process, it causes significant disruption to the surface, landscaping, and surrounding ecosystems.

Boring, also known as directional boring, is a less invasive alternative that uses a drill to create a tunnel for utility lines without disturbing the surface. This method is more precise and is ideal for installations that need to go underneath buildings, roads, or bodies of water. Although boring is less disruptive, it is generally more expensive than trenching.

Mudjacking restores level surfaces, prevents further damage, and is more cost-effective than a full replacement.

Mudjacking typically takes 24 to 72 hours (one to three days) to dry and cure completely before you can resume normal use. The exact time can vary depending on the size of the project. Because the slurry mixture contains cement, it must fully harden to ensure that added weight from walking, furniture, or vehicles won't shift the concrete slab. A professional contractor can advise you on when the surface is safe to use. For comparison, if you use polyjacking instead, the polyurethane foam can dry in just a few minutes, but it's best to wait about an hour before use.

Yes, you can mudjack cracked concrete, but the cracks will need to be repaired once the concrete has been leveled. If the concrete is severely cracked in multiple places, replacement may be a better option, but for less severe cracking, mudjacking is a good solution as long as cracks are correctly caulked and sealed.

The Culbertson, NE homeowners’ guide to concrete mudjacking services

From average costs to expert advice, get all the answers you need to get your job done.

See all articles