Top-rated concrete mudjacking pros.

Get matched with top concrete mudjacking pros in Culbertson, NE

Enter your zip and get matched with up to 5 pros

Need a pro for your concrete mudjacking project in Culbertson, NE?

Select your specific project to find the pro for you.

Find Concrete mudjacking pros in Culbertson

Avatar for Tillotson Enterprises, Inc.
Tillotson Enterprises, Inc.
5.0(
1
)

Serving Culbertson, NE and surrounding areas

In business since 1997

Free estimates

Credit card accepted

"They did a really good job. They were very knowledgeable and explained what they were going to do. They were very professional. I highly recommend them."
Finished photo
After application of Top coat
Kearney Crime Lab
Roof after polyurethane foam & base being appl
Edge work

+8

Response time1 day
Response rate96%
Recommended by100%of homeowners
Concrete Mudjacking questions, answered by experts

It restores concrete, prevents replacement cost disruptions, reduces trip hazards, and provides stability at a lower cost.

Yes, you can mudjack cracked concrete, but the cracks will need to be repaired once the concrete has been leveled. If the concrete is severely cracked in multiple places, replacement may be a better option, but for less severe cracking, mudjacking is a good solution as long as cracks are correctly caulked and sealed.

Trenching and boring are two distinct methods for installing underground utilities. Trenching involves digging a channel using equipment like an excavator, trencher, backhoe, or shovel. While it is a simpler process, it causes significant disruption to the surface, landscaping, and surrounding ecosystems.

Boring, also known as directional boring, is a less invasive alternative that uses a drill to create a tunnel for utility lines without disturbing the surface. This method is more precise and is ideal for installations that need to go underneath buildings, roads, or bodies of water. Although boring is less disruptive, it is generally more expensive than trenching.

Polyjacking and mudjacking can both be effective solutions for sinking concrete, but they have key differences. Polyjacking, which uses expanding polyurethane foam, is often considered a better option because the foam is significantly lighter than the cementitious material used for mudjacking. This reduced weight puts less pressure on the underlying soil and lowers the risk of future sinking. Polyjacking is suitable for any sinking concrete slab, while mudjacking is typically only recommended for non-structural concrete, such as sidewalks, patios, pool decks, and driveways. The primary drawback of polyjacking is its cost, which can be up to four times higher than mudjacking—as much as $25 per square foot compared to a maximum of about $6 per square foot for mudjacking.

Mudjacking is your best bet for leveling concrete on a tighter budget. It’s less expensive than foam or grout mixture. For smaller, surface-level issues, you could also use a self-leveling compound, which creates an even surface over existing concrete—it’s a budget-friendly option suitable for DIY enthusiasts.

The Culbertson, NE homeowners’ guide to concrete mudjacking services

From average costs to expert advice, get all the answers you need to get your job done.