Get matched with top concrete mudjacking pros in Brandon, MN
Top-rated concrete mudjacking pros.

Need a pro for your concrete mudjacking project in Brandon, MN?

Select your specific project to find the pro for you.

Verified Reviews for Concrete Mudjacking pros in Brandon, MN

*The Angi rating for Concrete Mudjacking companies in Brandon, MN is a rating based on verified reviews from our community of homeowners who have used these pros to meet their Concrete Mudjacking needs.

*The HomeAdvisor rating for Concrete Mudjacking companies in Brandon, MN is a rating based on verified reviews from our community of homeowners who have used these pros to meet their Concrete Mudjacking needs.

Last update on March 28, 2026

Find Concrete mudjacking pros in Brandon

Avatar for American Waterworks
American Waterworks
4.6(
170
)

Serving Brandon, MN and surrounding areas

Approved

In business since 1989

Free estimates

Warranties offered

"Quoting was fair and easy. There was a bit of a mix up between the quote and the person's doing the work, but was resolved fairly quickly the work was done just as quickly. Our concrete was raised noticeably and our issue resolved at the time of the work. They have a great warranty, which should be considered with every job in my opinion, it's a fair price for peace of mind! Would use again and have already pass along a referral!"
Another Sinking Floor
Dirt Crawlspace in Elk Mound, WI
Concrete stoop had sunk over 6 inches
Foundation Failure Signs
Increased Efficiency of Crawlspace in Elk Mound

+156

Response time3 hrs
638 neighbors recently requested a quote
Recommended by92%of homeowners
Request Quote
Avatar for Groundworks
Groundworks
4.3(
247
)

Serving Brandon, MN and surrounding areas

Approved (Corporate)

In business since 2005

Free estimates

Warranties offered

"Our project was to lift and balance a garage floor and long driveway using foam. Marc, Ben and Andrew showed up on time, did a thorough job, explaining the process every inch of the way. They did what was contracted for plus a bit. The cleanup was everything I could have asked for. We were told exactly what possible problems to watch for and what to do about them. A very good experience and a good warranty."
Foundation
Basement Waterproofing
Basement Waterproofing
Basement Waterproofing
Basement Waterproofing

+16

140 neighbors recently requested a quote
Recommended by88%of homeowners
Request Quote
Concrete Mudjacking questions, answered by experts

Trenching and boring are two distinct methods for installing underground utilities. Trenching involves digging a channel using equipment like an excavator, trencher, backhoe, or shovel. While it is a simpler process, it causes significant disruption to the surface, landscaping, and surrounding ecosystems.

Boring, also known as directional boring, is a less invasive alternative that uses a drill to create a tunnel for utility lines without disturbing the surface. This method is more precise and is ideal for installations that need to go underneath buildings, roads, or bodies of water. Although boring is less disruptive, it is generally more expensive than trenching.

There is no real alternative to underpinning, although mudjacking and polyjacking are other repair methods that can add support from underneath your foundation. Rather than placing supportive piers under your structure, these involve pumping a material under your slab to lift a sunken section back into its original position. Polyjacking, in particular, is sometimes a suitable solution for stabilization issues under slab foundations, but underpinning is often accepted as the best and most permanent solution.

Concrete leveling is not typically covered by insurance. In some cases where the shifting concrete is caused by a natural disaster or storm, you may be able to file an insurance claim if your policy specifically covers those circumstances. In most cases, though, you’ll pay out-of-pocket for concrete leveling.

Polyjacking and mudjacking can both be effective solutions for sinking concrete, but they have key differences. Polyjacking, which uses expanding polyurethane foam, is often considered a better option because the foam is significantly lighter than the cementitious material used for mudjacking. This reduced weight puts less pressure on the underlying soil and lowers the risk of future sinking. Polyjacking is suitable for any sinking concrete slab, while mudjacking is typically only recommended for non-structural concrete, such as sidewalks, patios, pool decks, and driveways. The primary drawback of polyjacking is its cost, which can be up to four times higher than mudjacking—as much as $25 per square foot compared to a maximum of about $6 per square foot for mudjacking.

Mudjacking is suitable for sidewalks, driveways, patios, and nearly all exterior flat structures. However, it may not suit severely damaged or heavily cracked areas.

The Brandon, MN homeowners’ guide to concrete mudjacking services

From average costs to expert advice, get all the answers you need to get your job done.

See all articles