Top-rated concrete mudjacking pros.

Get matched with top concrete mudjacking pros in Fairfax, SC

Enter your zip and get matched with up to 5 pros

Need a pro for your concrete mudjacking project in Fairfax, SC?

Select your specific project to find the pro for you.

Find Concrete mudjacking pros in Fairfax

Avatar for Desmon Simmons Construction
Desmon Simmons Construction
4.9(
8
)

Serving Fairfax, SC and surrounding areas

In business since 2022

Free estimates

"Everything went well very professional company was on time cleaned up after their self very well mannered and I really think you should hire him on your next concrete job"
Driveways - Concrete Project
Driveways - Concrete Project
Concrete - Pouring & Repair Project
Concrete - Pouring & Repair Project
Concrete

+48

Recommended by100%of homeowners
Avatar for Boucon USA
Boucon USA
4.3(
12
)

Serving Fairfax, SC and surrounding areas

Emergency services offered

Credit card accepted

"It went very well. Boucon USA removed my original driveway, hauled off all of the spoils and poured my new driveway all in one day. Very professional and clean. I would be willing to hire them again for any concrete needs."
Additional Photos
Additional Photos
Additional Photos
Additional Photos
Additional Photos

+1

Recommended by90%of homeowners
E Ramsey Concrete & Masonry LLC
3.7(
21
)

Serving Fairfax, SC and surrounding areas

In business since 1985

Free estimates

"Excellent! Mr. Ramsey arrived with his crew as promised, removed the old driveway and leveled the grade. He then set in the forms and made sure that I was happy with the design, which was much better than the straight lined boxy driveway I had. He pushed the new concrete pad further back, added some curves, and then really pulled it together with the sidewalk! Everyone who came by raved at how beautiful the job turned out, and how much it improved the curb appeal of my home!"
Recommended by84%of homeowners
Concrete Mudjacking questions, answered by experts

It’s best not to perform mudjacking in the winter unless the ground temperature remains above freezing. Freezing temperatures can cause the slurry to harden too quickly, compromising its strength and longevity. Concrete is also more susceptible to cracking and splitting in cold temperatures, so there’s a higher risk of damaging the slab during the drilling and lifting process in winter.

Mudjacking typically takes 24 to 72 hours (one to three days) to dry and cure completely before you can resume normal use. The exact time can vary depending on the size of the project. Because the slurry mixture contains cement, it must fully harden to ensure that added weight from walking, furniture, or vehicles won't shift the concrete slab. A professional contractor can advise you on when the surface is safe to use. For comparison, if you use polyjacking instead, the polyurethane foam can dry in just a few minutes, but it's best to wait about an hour before use.

Concrete leveling is not typically covered by insurance. In some cases where the shifting concrete is caused by a natural disaster or storm, you may be able to file an insurance claim if your policy specifically covers those circumstances. In most cases, though, you’ll pay out-of-pocket for concrete leveling.

Trenching and boring are two distinct methods for installing underground utilities. Trenching involves digging a channel using equipment like an excavator, trencher, backhoe, or shovel. While it is a simpler process, it causes significant disruption to the surface, landscaping, and surrounding ecosystems.

Boring, also known as directional boring, is a less invasive alternative that uses a drill to create a tunnel for utility lines without disturbing the surface. This method is more precise and is ideal for installations that need to go underneath buildings, roads, or bodies of water. Although boring is less disruptive, it is generally more expensive than trenching.

Polyjacking and mudjacking can both be effective solutions for sinking concrete, but they have key differences. Polyjacking, which uses expanding polyurethane foam, is often considered a better option because the foam is significantly lighter than the cementitious material used for mudjacking. This reduced weight puts less pressure on the underlying soil and lowers the risk of future sinking. Polyjacking is suitable for any sinking concrete slab, while mudjacking is typically only recommended for non-structural concrete, such as sidewalks, patios, pool decks, and driveways. The primary drawback of polyjacking is its cost, which can be up to four times higher than mudjacking—as much as $25 per square foot compared to a maximum of about $6 per square foot for mudjacking.

The Fairfax, SC homeowners’ guide to concrete mudjacking services

From average costs to expert advice, get all the answers you need to get your job done.