Top-rated concrete mudjacking pros.

Get matched with top concrete mudjacking pros in Magazine, AR

Enter your zip and get matched with up to 5 pros

Need a pro for your concrete mudjacking project in Magazine, AR?

Select your specific project to find the pro for you.

Find Concrete mudjacking pros in Magazine

Avatar for Vesta Foundation Solutions of Arkansas, LLC
Vesta Foundation Solutions of Arkansas, LLC
4.1(
29
)
Concrete - Injection Leveling - MudjackingConcrete - Injection Leveling - Mudjacking - For Business

Serving Magazine, AR and surrounding areas

Approved

In business since 2016

Free estimates

Warranties offered

"VESTA sent us the outstanding team of JUSTIN and GREG to accomplish an outstanding job in our concrete driveway. They filled the underground voids and leveled off the several misadjusted segments of the driveway. Top notch. Justin and Greg are very courteous and respectful. They kept us informed at every step. They were very diligent and hardworking, particularly on cold temperature days. Upon completion they left the driveway in showroom condition. Or as our British cousins would say: Good show!! Jolly good show!! Bravo Zulu to VESTA and team."
Before
After
Response time3 days
39 neighbors recently requested a quote
Recommended by73%of homeowners
Concrete Mudjacking questions, answered by experts

Yes, expanding foam (also known as polyurethane foam) can lift concrete. This approach, called polyjacking, involves injecting the foam rather than concrete slurry to fill voids and raise the concrete slab back into place. It’s often faster and requires smaller drill holes than traditional mudjacking, though it may come at a higher cost. Some contractors also prefer polyjacking over mudjacking for more damaged and delicate slabs.

It’s best not to perform mudjacking in the winter unless the ground temperature remains above freezing. Freezing temperatures can cause the slurry to harden too quickly, compromising its strength and longevity. Concrete is also more susceptible to cracking and splitting in cold temperatures, so there’s a higher risk of damaging the slab during the drilling and lifting process in winter.

Mudjacking restores level surfaces, prevents further damage, and is more cost-effective than a full replacement.

Polyjacking and mudjacking can both be effective solutions for sinking concrete, but they have key differences. Polyjacking, which uses expanding polyurethane foam, is often considered a better option because the foam is significantly lighter than the cementitious material used for mudjacking. This reduced weight puts less pressure on the underlying soil and lowers the risk of future sinking. Polyjacking is suitable for any sinking concrete slab, while mudjacking is typically only recommended for non-structural concrete, such as sidewalks, patios, pool decks, and driveways. The primary drawback of polyjacking is its cost, which can be up to four times higher than mudjacking—as much as $25 per square foot compared to a maximum of about $6 per square foot for mudjacking.

A slurry of cement, sand, and water is injected beneath the concrete to lift and stabilize it.

The Magazine, AR homeowners’ guide to concrete mudjacking services

From average costs to expert advice, get all the answers you need to get your job done.