Top-rated concrete mudjacking pros.

Get matched with top concrete mudjacking pros in Lead, SD

Enter your zip and get matched with up to 5 pros

Need a pro for your concrete mudjacking project in Lead, SD?

Select your specific project to find the pro for you.

Find Concrete mudjacking pros in Lead

Avatar for Blackburn Foundation Repair, LLC
Blackburn Foundation Repair, LLC
4.6(
23
)

Serving Lead, SD and surrounding areas

Approved

In business since 1992

Free estimates

Warranties offered

"Excellent service! Pro was nice, easy to work with, professional! Never would have known he was here, he cleaned the working area so well! I would definitely recommend Blackburn Basement!!"
Crawl Space Repair
Crawl Space Repair
Response time1 day
93 neighbors recently requested a quote
Recommended by80%of homeowners
Sunken Foundation Solutions
4.9(
9
)

Serving Lead, SD and surrounding areas

Approved

In business since 2018

Free estimates

Offers commercial services

"Throughly amazed with the quality of work these gentlemen did on our home. They were extremely hard workers that returned my phone calls, showed up to work when they said they would and cleaned up the work area each day. You donâ t find many younger people with this work ethic any more. Would highly recommend them and will use them again!"
Foundation Replacement in Rapid City
Concrete Stair Foundation
Foundation Repair
Retaining Wall Install
Retaining Wall Repair

+21

Response time1 day
Response rate85%
Recommended by100%of homeowners
Concrete Mudjacking questions, answered by experts

Trenching and boring are two distinct methods for installing underground utilities. Trenching involves digging a channel using equipment like an excavator, trencher, backhoe, or shovel. While it is a simpler process, it causes significant disruption to the surface, landscaping, and surrounding ecosystems.

Boring, also known as directional boring, is a less invasive alternative that uses a drill to create a tunnel for utility lines without disturbing the surface. This method is more precise and is ideal for installations that need to go underneath buildings, roads, or bodies of water. Although boring is less disruptive, it is generally more expensive than trenching.

Address drainage issues, avoid heavy loads, and seal cracks to prevent future settling.

The polyurethane used for polyjacking will expand and cure in 15 to 30 minutes. After that point, your slab will be safe to walk on and even drive on in the case of a sidewalk or concrete driveway. Double-check with your concrete lifting specialist to confirm a curing timeline, as products can differ.

Polyjacking and mudjacking can both be effective solutions for sinking concrete, but they have key differences. Polyjacking, which uses expanding polyurethane foam, is often considered a better option because the foam is significantly lighter than the cementitious material used for mudjacking. This reduced weight puts less pressure on the underlying soil and lowers the risk of future sinking. Polyjacking is suitable for any sinking concrete slab, while mudjacking is typically only recommended for non-structural concrete, such as sidewalks, patios, pool decks, and driveways. The primary drawback of polyjacking is its cost, which can be up to four times higher than mudjacking—as much as $25 per square foot compared to a maximum of about $6 per square foot for mudjacking.

The average cost for mudjacking is around $1,200, though prices can range from $300 to $3,400. On a per-square-foot basis, you can expect to pay between $3 and $8, with an average of about $5 per square foot. The final cost depends on several factors, including the square footage of the concrete, the type of slab, its accessibility, whether it is load-bearing, and the type of material used to lift it. Generally, lifting a driveway, small patio, or sidewalk is less expensive than lifting a slab foundation or garage floor.

The Lead, SD homeowners’ guide to concrete mudjacking services

From average costs to expert advice, get all the answers you need to get your job done.