Top-rated concrete mudjacking pros.

Get matched with top concrete mudjacking pros in Ocean View, HI

Enter your zip and get matched with up to 5 pros

Need a pro for your concrete mudjacking project in Ocean View, HI?

Select your specific project to find the pro for you.

Verified Reviews for Concrete Mudjacking pros in Ocean View, HI

*The Angi rating for Concrete Mudjacking companies in Ocean View, HI is a rating based on verified reviews from our community of homeowners who have used these pros to meet their Concrete Mudjacking needs.

*The HomeAdvisor rating for Concrete Mudjacking companies in Ocean View, HI is a rating based on verified reviews from our community of homeowners who have used these pros to meet their Concrete Mudjacking needs.

Last update on March 11, 2026

Find Concrete mudjacking pros in Ocean View

Avatar for SP2 Construction LLC
SP2 Construction LLC
5.0(
1
)

Serving Ocean View, HI and surrounding areas

In business since 2020

Free estimates

Credit card accepted

"I needed someone to put up some fencing around my property. Sean and his crew did an awesome job! They were efficient and finished the job in a timely manner. I’d definitely use SP2 construction again in the future"
Additional Photos
Additional Photos
Additional Photos
Additional Photos
Response rate100%
Recommended by100%of homeowners
Request Quote
Concrete Mudjacking questions, answered by experts

Trenching and boring are two distinct methods for installing underground utilities. Trenching involves digging a channel using equipment like an excavator, trencher, backhoe, or shovel. While it is a simpler process, it causes significant disruption to the surface, landscaping, and surrounding ecosystems.

Boring, also known as directional boring, is a less invasive alternative that uses a drill to create a tunnel for utility lines without disturbing the surface. This method is more precise and is ideal for installations that need to go underneath buildings, roads, or bodies of water. Although boring is less disruptive, it is generally more expensive than trenching.

A slurry of cement, sand, and water is injected beneath the concrete to lift and stabilize it.

Polyjacking and mudjacking can both be effective solutions for sinking concrete, but they have key differences. Polyjacking, which uses expanding polyurethane foam, is often considered a better option because the foam is significantly lighter than the cementitious material used for mudjacking. This reduced weight puts less pressure on the underlying soil and lowers the risk of future sinking. Polyjacking is suitable for any sinking concrete slab, while mudjacking is typically only recommended for non-structural concrete, such as sidewalks, patios, pool decks, and driveways. The primary drawback of polyjacking is its cost, which can be up to four times higher than mudjacking—as much as $25 per square foot compared to a maximum of about $6 per square foot for mudjacking.

There is no real alternative to underpinning, although mudjacking and polyjacking are other repair methods that can add support from underneath your foundation. Rather than placing supportive piers under your structure, these involve pumping a material under your slab to lift a sunken section back into its original position. Polyjacking, in particular, is sometimes a suitable solution for stabilization issues under slab foundations, but underpinning is often accepted as the best and most permanent solution.

Many contractors offer warranties for their work. Confirm terms before starting the project.

The Ocean View, HI homeowners’ guide to concrete mudjacking services

From average costs to expert advice, get all the answers you need to get your job done.

See all articles