Top-rated concrete mudjacking pros.

Get matched with top concrete mudjacking pros in Greasewood, AZ

Enter your zip and get matched with up to 5 pros

Need a pro for your concrete mudjacking project in Greasewood, AZ?

Select your specific project to find the pro for you.

Find Concrete mudjacking pros in Greasewood

Avatar for Groundworks
Groundworks
5.0(
6
)
Concrete - Injection Leveling - MudjackingConcrete - Injection Leveling - Mudjacking - For Business

Serving Greasewood, AZ and surrounding areas

Approved (Corporate)

In business since 2017

Free estimates

Warranties offered

"We are still in the budgeting phase and have not contacted yet however Scott Hughes of Groundwork’s was a great resource. He provided detailed information on the issues and how they would resolve them for us."
Concrete
Concrete
Concrete
Concrete
Concrete

+16

89 neighbors recently requested a quote
Request Quote
Avatar for Garcias Constructors LLC
Garcias Constructors LLC
New to Angi
Concrete - Injection Leveling - MudjackingConcrete - Injection Leveling - Mudjacking - For Business

Serving Greasewood, AZ and surrounding areas

In business since 2022

Free estimates

Emergency services offered

Here at Garcias Constructors we work hard every day to meet and exceed any Excavation,Grading,Asphalt prep, Drainage/Pipe, Gravel, Pads, projects you need done. Any type of Concrete.

side walk and drive way
Additional Photos
Request Quote
Concrete Mudjacking questions, answered by experts

Trenching and boring are two distinct methods for installing underground utilities. Trenching involves digging a channel using equipment like an excavator, trencher, backhoe, or shovel. While it is a simpler process, it causes significant disruption to the surface, landscaping, and surrounding ecosystems.

Boring, also known as directional boring, is a less invasive alternative that uses a drill to create a tunnel for utility lines without disturbing the surface. This method is more precise and is ideal for installations that need to go underneath buildings, roads, or bodies of water. Although boring is less disruptive, it is generally more expensive than trenching.

Polyjacking and mudjacking can both be effective solutions for sinking concrete, but they have key differences. Polyjacking, which uses expanding polyurethane foam, is often considered a better option because the foam is significantly lighter than the cementitious material used for mudjacking. This reduced weight puts less pressure on the underlying soil and lowers the risk of future sinking. Polyjacking is suitable for any sinking concrete slab, while mudjacking is typically only recommended for non-structural concrete, such as sidewalks, patios, pool decks, and driveways. The primary drawback of polyjacking is its cost, which can be up to four times higher than mudjacking—as much as $25 per square foot compared to a maximum of about $6 per square foot for mudjacking.

Costs range from $500 to $1,500, depending on the size and condition of the area.

A sinking foundation can be lifted, most often by installing piers to re-level and support the weight of the house. Depending on the cause and extent of the sinking, other methods to lift a foundation include underpinning and mudjacking. Consult a foundation repair pro to determine the best way to lift your sinking foundation. 

There is no real alternative to underpinning, although mudjacking and polyjacking are other repair methods that can add support from underneath your foundation. Rather than placing supportive piers under your structure, these involve pumping a material under your slab to lift a sunken section back into its original position. Polyjacking, in particular, is sometimes a suitable solution for stabilization issues under slab foundations, but underpinning is often accepted as the best and most permanent solution.

The Greasewood, AZ homeowners’ guide to concrete mudjacking services

From average costs to expert advice, get all the answers you need to get your job done.

See all articles