Top-rated concrete mudjacking pros.

Get matched with top concrete mudjacking pros in Princeton, ME

Enter your zip and get matched with up to 5 pros

Need a pro for your concrete mudjacking project in Princeton, ME?

Select your specific project to find the pro for you.

Verified Reviews for Concrete Mudjacking pros in Princeton, ME

*The Angi rating for Concrete Mudjacking companies in Princeton, ME is a rating based on verified reviews from our community of homeowners who have used these pros to meet their Concrete Mudjacking needs.

*The HomeAdvisor rating for Concrete Mudjacking companies in Princeton, ME is a rating based on verified reviews from our community of homeowners who have used these pros to meet their Concrete Mudjacking needs.

Last update on January 15, 2026

Find Concrete mudjacking pros in Princeton

CreteMaster.com
New to Angi
Concrete - Injection Leveling - MudjackingConcrete - Injection Leveling - Mudjacking - For Business

Serving Princeton, ME and surrounding areas

In business since 2016

Free estimates

At CreteMaster.com, we take great pride in our experience, expertise, quality, and customer service that we provide. It is our mission to provide excellent workmanship and complete customer satisfaction, from the start to the completion of a project. In order to understand the needs and expectations of our customers, we take great care to work and communicate with every customer in a professional manner. Our reputation is based on service, safety, and quality, regardless of how large or small the job.

Response time1 day
Request Quote
Concrete Mudjacking questions, answered by experts

Polyjacking and mudjacking can both be effective solutions for sinking concrete, but they have key differences. Polyjacking, which uses expanding polyurethane foam, is often considered a better option because the foam is significantly lighter than the cementitious material used for mudjacking. This reduced weight puts less pressure on the underlying soil and lowers the risk of future sinking. Polyjacking is suitable for any sinking concrete slab, while mudjacking is typically only recommended for non-structural concrete, such as sidewalks, patios, pool decks, and driveways. The primary drawback of polyjacking is its cost, which can be up to four times higher than mudjacking—as much as $25 per square foot compared to a maximum of about $6 per square foot for mudjacking.

Trenching and boring are two distinct methods for installing underground utilities. Trenching involves digging a channel using equipment like an excavator, trencher, backhoe, or shovel. While it is a simpler process, it causes significant disruption to the surface, landscaping, and surrounding ecosystems.

Boring, also known as directional boring, is a less invasive alternative that uses a drill to create a tunnel for utility lines without disturbing the surface. This method is more precise and is ideal for installations that need to go underneath buildings, roads, or bodies of water. Although boring is less disruptive, it is generally more expensive than trenching.

Costs range from $500 to $1,500, depending on the size and condition of the area.

Mudjacking is suitable for sidewalks, driveways, patios, and nearly all exterior flat structures. However, it may not suit severely damaged or heavily cracked areas.

The method involves lifting settled concrete using pressurized cement slurry via drilled holes. This solves uneven surfaces and prevents further settling.

The Princeton, ME homeowners’ guide to concrete mudjacking services

From average costs to expert advice, get all the answers you need to get your job done.

See all articles