Dassoc Painting
About us
Dassoc Painting specializing in painting & staining contracting work in the St Paul area. Using St Paul licensed contractors that are certified contractors can give you an advantage when you are searching for painting and staining maintenance or home improvement services in St Paul. Many of these contractors understand the construction work, painting and staining, and the other specialized services. Additionally, local painting and staining contractors registered with contractor's license at the local level, and many with a "certified" painting & staining license are allowed to work anywhere in the state of Minnesota. Please call Minnesota Licenses and Certificates at (651) 284-5067 to verify MN painting and staining contractor's license.
Business highlights
Services we offer
Interor painting, and exterior and decks commercial and resident etc.
Amenities
Free Estimates
Yes
Number of Stars | Image of Distribution | Number of Ratings |
---|---|---|
60% | ||
0% | ||
0% | ||
0% | ||
40% |
LLC, 409 Meadow Lane, Somerset, Wisconsin, for an exterior painting job during
the summer of 2015. A former business name was Appalachian Painting. My wife
and I are extremely dissatisfied with his work. Unfortunately, we did not begin
to discover the results of Walker?s omissions and shortcuts until several days
after I had paid Walker as he was leaving.
Walker uses a common type of industry contract. The second sentence states: ?All work
to be completed in a substantial workmanlike manner according to specifications,
per standard practices.? Walker did not follow standard industry practices.
Walker did not cover our windows prior to spraying stain. As a result he coated our
windows with a fine mist of stain. That is 33 glass sash panels of
approximately two by four feet each plus two glass door panels. It took us many
hours over three days to clean the stain from the windows.
Walker also did not renew the caulking, as is standard industry practice, and despite my
comments to him about the need for such caulking prior to him even writing the
contract. As a result, within two days the new trim paint near some areas of deteriorated caulk puckered
and could be peeled off with a finger nail. Moisture had evidently infiltrated the deteriorated caulk prior to painting.
Some areas of trim that had been primed appeared to have not been painted at all and
one end of the house and garage had areas of non-matching paint splotches of a
cream colored flat paint on the white of the trim. The front dormer window trim,
after painting, showed a spot of bare wood, barely noticeable from ground
level, surrounded by cracked, flaking original paint. This area was part of the
scope of the project. Despite working on adjacent trim, Walker managed to miss
this one segment with his pressure washer, and while scraping and priming and while painting.
As we discovered the problems with Walker?s work, I sent Walker several letters
outlining the issues and enclosing photographs for illustration. After receiving
the first letter, Walker returned and did a cursory job of painting the primed
but unpainted areas and covering most of the mis-matched paint. While Walker acknowledged
missing some areas of painting, he said he couldn?t understand how the windows
could have been misted while spraying because he had rolled and brushed around
windows, and he also couldn?t believe the new paint had peeled in spots; no
apologies, just disbelief. Despite the peeling new paint Walker?s position is that
he was not required to renew caulking because he did not write it in the
contract. He ignores that the fundamental language of his contract requires:
?All work to be completed in a substantial workmanlike manner according to
specifications, per standard practices?. Caulking prior to painting is a
standard practice.
While I worked at replacing deteriorated caulk, removing puckered new paint, repainting and
viewing up close Walker?s poor work or lack thereof I became exasperated. I
sent Walker a second letter demanding a partial refund for cleaning the stain
coating from our windows and for present and future (back of the house I didn?t
get to) repairing of Walker?s failed paint and work he didn?t do. Walker sent a
letter response that is a piece of work.
In his letter Walker accepts no responsibility for anything and blames all of his shortcuts,
errors, omissions and poor results on me; including his buying of one can of
non matching paint. Apparently a Walker customer has no reasonable expectation
that his new paint won?t peel within two days. I gave Walker until November 10,
to remit the partial refund. Walker sent no refund, not even for the window
cleaning. I have heard nothing further from him
Prior to Walker, we had had our house stained and painted three times over the years without issue so we have some concept of what should happen. Walker talks a good game but substitutes shortcuts and omissions for quality work. Walker was not low priced to begin with so in the end his poor quality work and refusal to take responsibility makes him very expensive.
Licensing
State Contractor License Requirements
All statements concerning insurance, licenses, and bonds are informational only, and are self-reported. Since insurance, licenses and bonds can expire and can be cancelled, homeowners should always check such information for themselves. To find more licensing information for your state, visit our Find Licensing Requirements page.
*Contact business to see additional licenses.