I will preface this review by noting that I have moved 17 times in the last decade, both regionally and cross-country. I have used several moving companies and I have never had a bad experience. My experience with Chipman was shocking, from start to finish. The short version is DO NOT USE THIS COMPANY. The longer version: 1. The quote call: I was asked to FaceTime for a quote call, which was fine. I was a little put-off by the quoter, Paul, who continued to refer to my "husband" after I corrected him several times, but overall he seemed nice. I emphasized the time-sensitivity of our move, and that our belongings needed to arrive on or before Jan. 8th to make it work for us. He assured me they could do that, and that he would return the quote same-day due to the time sensitivity. He also assured me that the items I specified as fragile on the quote call would be covered under the standard FVP at $60 / pound. We specifically worked out the calculation of the Le Creuset that I own to work through the math. He explained that high value would be over $100 / pound, which I agreed would be fine. Paul did not return the quote within 24 hours. I followed up with him the next afternoon and he issued me a standard quote. I immediately follow up to confirm the delivery date since none was specified, and he said "he couldn't remember when I said I had needed the belongings" but that no, January 8th would not be feasible. (No apology, either.) The quote detail specified insurance that was different than what was covered on the call, so I followed up on that, too. The contract listed the insurance of FMV at $6/pound, unless waived for the default of $.60/pound. The subsequent correspondence was infuriating. Paul first suggested that there was "no such thing" as $6/pound insurance, despite the fact that the contract said it on its face, as does the United website (for whom they are subcontractors). He also repeatedly told me that I was "confused," which is a fast way to infuriate a well-educated female professional. When I quoted the website back to him, he conceded, and agreed United would permit me to raise the insurance coverage to $12/pound (still far below what he originally told me) for an additional fee. 2. We were then handed over to our move coordinator, Jennifer. Jennifer didn't reach out to me, I reached out to her after several days of waiting (Paul listed her email address and her role in his correspondence). I asked Jennifer if she could specify an ETA for the movers since we had a shared driveway and I needed to notify our neighbors (on the "from" end) and book a loading dock (on the "to" end). She left me a VM that the movers would arrive between 8-9AM. She did not mention the contractor who needed to crate my partner's 3D printer, so I assumed that they would arrive along with the movers. Instead, two days prior to our move, we received a call from the subcontractor at 4:45PM asking to come the next morning (a work day, and not our move day) to crate the 3D printer. Because of the time sensitivity, I rearranged my schedule to allow that to happen. When the belongings arrived at our destination, Jennifer had not booked anyone to un-crate the 3D printer, and I had to contact her to have the charges associated with the un-crating to be removed. Furthermore, Jennifer called me Friday afternoon (our move was on Monday morning) to let me know that actually the movers would be arriving 9-11AM, rather than 8-9AM as advised earlier. Again, we rearranged our schedules to accommodate the potential for a longer time horizon (i.e., my partner canceled several afternoon meetings just in case). Because Chipman weighs and loads the belongings for cross-country shipping at their facility rather than at the "from" location, they could not immediately confirm what our total billing would be. I said that was fine, but after several days went by and I was billed without any confirmation that our items were within the quoted weight range (or any communication from Chipman whatsoever), I reached out to Jennifer. I asked her to confirm that the items had fit into three containers as quoted, and she replies "yes everything fit into three containers." Well, that "three" was actually not true: the movers that Chipman subcontracted to bring the belongings to our apartment on the "to" end used a trailer, rather than a truck, so we could see that our belongings had been moved in two containers, not three. I had to affirmatively ask (3 weeks after our belongings were picked up) that I would be credited for the third container, which is required by their contract. I feel fairly confident that if I had not seen the belongings packed in two containers, and if I had not asked about it, that Jennifer would have been happy for me to believe it had been shipped in three, and I would not been credited for one container. I was stunned -- I have it in writing that she says it was shipped in "three." (Also: Chipman won't agree to refund the credit for up to 30 days from delivery, which means I've essentially lent them $950 for 1.5 months.) Also, because the items arrived on a trailer rather than re-packed in a truck for delivery, we could see how they had been packed. It was, again, shocking. We had carefully labeled items with arrows on four sides, "fragile," and "top." Some of these boxes were found on their side at the bottom of the crates. Even the subcontracted movers commented that it was a bad job, and that it looked like it had been done to fit it in two containers. For example: both our big-screen TV and my sewing machine -- which were clearly marked and in their original packaging -- made the 3,000 mile trip on their SIDES at the BOTTOM of the container. Packing mechanical items on their sides is well-known to damage them, even if not apparently "broken" upon unboxing. I was infuriated. All of our boxes were crushed and in terrible shape upon arrival. It is only because we took extra care when packing them (ourselves) that nothing ended up broken. I will say that the subcontracted movers who loaded our belongings to bring them to the Chipman site and the subcontracted movers who brought them to our new apartment were all thoughtful, efficient, courteous people. But I cannot emphasize enough that I would rather pay DOUBLE what I paid for this move than to ever use a contractor like this again. It was an absolute mess, ending with finding out that I won't get their customer service satisfaction survey for over 30 days because Jennifer failed to update my account for 1 week after delivery, which (according to United CS) fails to trigger the survey distribution.