WILLIAM J MARTIN

The architect reviewed the current status of the home when hired. Asked many questions as to the home's use and whether any specific goals were sought in the remodeling. Measured the home and drew a thorough drawing of the visible existing conditions. Then offered a preliminary drawing based upon our requests for us to review; after which he asked more questions to assert that what we thought we wanted was actually going to meet our living goals.

After we set on the design characteristics, very detailed plans were drawn so that no building questions remained. The builders who quoted had no ambiguity as to the requirements, thereby minimizing concerns for potential unnecessary contractor extras to boost costs. The only extras encountered were those brought about by unforeseeable problems within the old building's structure, not uncommon for an old house.

Throughout the construction process the architect was basically on call to the builder, if a question arose. Even during the quoting process. One contractor noted that the detail wasn't necessary if you have a good contractor. Unfortunately that's not true. Even good contractors miss details and if a detail is missing on the drawing, the contractor can't be held responsible. Detailed drawings are necessary.

My background is in the aerospace industry where detailed drawings aren't an option. Anyone hiring an architect should assert the individual doing their drawings are licensed detail oriented professionals. Look at a sample of their work and check to see that they provide comprehensive drawing notes so that little is left to a builder's interpretation. Even the detail wording makes a difference. 

I can't stress it enough, for a remodeling project or new construction, quality architectural drawings represent the first block to a solid foundation of value to a home. Anything less will be a costly headache.