Paul Woolard Construction

THE WORK TOOK A MONTH LONGER THAN ORIGINALLY CONTRACTED AND REALLY 2 MONTHS LONGER THAN NECESSARY.  THERE WERE LENGTHY GAPS OF TIME 2 WEEKS OR MORE WHEN NO ONE ON SITE TO DO WORK.  GENERAL QUALITY OF THE OVERALL WORK WAS POOR.  WE NEEDED TO HAVE THEM COME BACK MULTIPLE TIMES TO RIP OUT, REPLACE AND REDO SHODDY WORK THAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE MORE EASILY AND CHEAPER AND BETTER IF DONE RIGHT THE FIRST TIME. COMMUNICATION BETWEEN GC AND SUBCONTRACTORS WAS NOT GOOD.  ON THE UPSIDE, THE PEOPLE WERE GENERALLY PROFESSIONAL AND POLITE AND FINALLY DID COMPLETE THE JOB ALTHOUGH SOME ASPECTS WILL STILL NEED TO BE REDONE TO A BETTER STANDARD.  THE GC GENERALLY FOUND THE CHEAPEST METHOD OF DOING EVERYTHING WITHOUT GREAT CONCERN FOR AESTHETIC OF THE JOB.