Haro Electric Solutions
About us
Welcome to Haro Electric Solutions. Inc, a full service, customer-focused electric company offering full electrical services for residential and commercial customers in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area. Our goal is to put the needs of our customers first, to use best materials and to offer our services at an affordable price. We are able to provide a wide variety of services to our customers, and our team of experienced contractors will get the job done efficiently and effectively. At Haro Electric Solutions. Inc, we are dedicated to providing a superior level of service to all of our customers. Make sure all of your electrical issues are attended to by enlisting the help of experts. Call today for a free estimate!
Services we offer
Panel upgrade experts. Office, business & residential wiring. Code & city compliance for all metro cities. Basement & addition wiring. Repair & maintenance. • Ceiling fans, lighting • New circuits and much more, plugs, switches
Accepted Payment Methods
- CreditCard
Number of Stars | Image of Distribution | Number of Ratings |
---|---|---|
83% | ||
5% | ||
0% | ||
2% | ||
11% |
All in all, they were called back 3 times to fix errors at rough-in stage, before being let go. I then had another electrician in to review the work, and we discovered many things not to code?the worst being 3 separate places where Haro Electric had left exposed wiring, 2 instances being live.
We are currently in a court dispute because after I let Haro Electric go from the project, the owner gave me 8 business days to pay before more than doubling the bill and sending to collection.
"This customer was referred by somebody we have been working successfully for few years. Unfortunately it turned bad. The work was correct and passed required inspection, plus we did go back and do further cleaning of this job site under construction. (not normal for an UNFINISHED job under construction) (we did move a switch at no charge on an UN finished wall, and offered to pay for the patch,) (we have professional tools and ladders, never a need to use customers tools) I'm afraid we had to deal with an unreasonable person, full of false accusations and false statements, such as accusing us of making the keyboard on her computer go bad, plus many others false statements, she refused to answer the phone or to have a face to face meeting, just many e-mail that we responded in a respectfully but firm manner. The job was 90% complete and only was paid 30% , customer stated that she is used to deal with collection company and to go ahead and put a lien on her house, in conclusion she never did pay. Per contract she signed we added the fees allowed by law and filed a small claims court case pending to be heard. In conclusion, we attempted to deal with this situation, the best we could, and address every one of her issues, every time doing more and more work with out getting paid, over 2 months overdue, once we are almost done she decides that she does not want us to finish. We will be asking to recover from the court the cost of the job completed part only and the recovery of our fees."
We only had one slight hiccup, when one of the Haro electricians came out to install the receptacle/control box for the backyard lighting. I was home at the time, but he didn't check in with me. Consequently, I didn't know he was here until he was almost finished. Instead of placing the control box inside the garage as Javier had told us they would do, he put it at knee-level outside, which isn't very practical in the MN elements. I called Javier afterwards, and he graciously made good on our original agreement and had it changed at no cost to us.
Overall, we were very happy with the work Haro Electric did, and we will definitely use them again and recommend them to friends.
I spoke to Xavier, the owner of Haro Electric, several times about the placement of the lights. He had some good suggestions, among them that I install track lighting so that I could have a variety of fixtures at a more affordable price. We discussed using pendants to bring some light down, as the ceilings are high. In my experience, tracks are generally flush to the ceiling, so I liked the idea of having varied lighting. As this is to be a salon, I was very concerned about the placement of the fixtures, particularly pendants, which I do not know how to hang from or configure to a track. Lighting is very important for what I do. Xavier said it was no problem, they could take care of that.
I thought that they were going to start on the 5th of December, ("I have 3 guys standing around, as soon as you bring the fixtures, we'll get in there", the fixtures, all but the ceiling fan, were waiting for the electricians by Sunday the 4th, which I explained on the phone) I had other contractors to schedule, as does everyone who's doing a project like this, and he was good about working with this.
It was my understanding when we met to sign the paperwork to get the project started that I would be involved in deciding where the tracks and fixtures were to go in the business I was opening. Much to my surprise, I showed up on Wednesday, the 7th, and the tracks were being hung suspended 2 ft. below the ceiling. 2 out of the 4 tracks had already been installed. I asked them to place the last two tracks, which were to be connected to each other, up quite a bit higher, as dropping it down 2 ft. was not going to work for me. No one had contacted me, as I had asked, about where to place the tracks and certainly not about dropping them. Xavier was not there, but the man who seemed to be heading up the operation seemed friendly and receptive.
I contacted Xavier via email on the 9th (they estimated working in the building for 2 weeks, so I knew they would be around for the next several days) I mentioned in my email about the dropped tracks. I had several other questions too, but my main concern were the tracks, which were not only dropped lower than I had expected, but did not go as far back as I had asked along the wall that is going to house the stations. Each time I had talked to Xavier prior to this, he would repeat what I said and tell me no problem, but I pretty much got the impression throughout that he wasn't listening to me anyway. I guess I shouldn't have been surprised when this was his response to my email: "We can certaily do any changes you desire however will cost extra. Any additional work and changes cost time and money , we do not have on this budget to do. I need to meet you and see what you need changed or added, and we can do a change order then please call me monday."
I met Xavier at the space on Monday. He complained that I hadn't called him immediately on Wednesday, as it would have saved him money. I explained that nothing was different than when I walked in on Wednesday, and I that I did save some time by asking the guys to install the remaining tracks the way I wanted them. He told me several times that I should have come to the space if I wanted to have a say in the matter, and I explained that I had been there every day, but since I wasn't scheduling his employees, I didn't know when they were going to be there. I felt it was their responsibility to contact me and that no changes would have had to be made if anyone had bothered calling. I would have met them there at any time. Xavier felt differently, blaming me for the misunderstanding. He had a real "you should have done this, you should have done that" attitude. At no time did anyone from Haro contact me about the work directly. I did compliment them on some of the work where the conduit looked sharp and had a nice 90 degree angle. I asked if the other connector, which was a mess, could look the same, I was told it would cost $140 to fix it. After I told him that I had never met a contractor who walked onto a site, did whatever they felt like doing and then charged the client to do it how they would like it done, he finally agreed to fix the height of the 2 low tracks and make the one look neater at no cost to me, but taking great pains to explain that at this point, the money was coming out of his own pocket. For one of the tracks that I wanted moved back about 2 feet, Xavier explained to me that that couldn't be done, as the track was "perfectly balanced", but he could add another 4 ft track at cost to me. I settled for his agreeing to raise the tracks at no cost to me, but to live with the one track that did not go far enough back along the wall, and to extend the other track that wasn't where I wanted it. I was told that extending the track 4 ft. would be a 2 hour job and I would be charged $140 for that and had to supply the track and the junction. I was also informed at that time that they could hang the pendants, but at a charge of $70 per hour, which I declined. I was skeptical about the 2 hour installation time of a track that appeared to me to just be clicked into another. At that point, he enlisted the opinion of one of the men actually doing the work and they agreed that it would take two guys a little over an hour. I am not an electrician, and, as Xavier knows, I do not know anything about installing track lighting. I would have paid off for me to learn, as it turns out. Unfortunately, Xavier and I signed a piece of paper saying that I was willing to purchase the track and the junction and pay $140 for 2 hours labor to fix the problem. At this point, I mostly just wanted to be done with it and was tired of hearing how he had underbid the whole job and how he wasn't making any money. Frankly, his prices for what was installed in my unit seem on par with any other electrician I've used. When I got to the store, I had help finding the track and the junction. Out of curiosity, I asked the attendant how long it takes to install one of these. The guy at home Depot told me that if I was adding it to an existing track, it would probably take about 10 minutes.
When I got back to the salon 23 minutes later, one of the tracks had already been raised and his two employees were sitting outside in their vans. It was looking less and less like plugging in a 4 ft track and mounting it to the ceiling was a 2 hour job. I called Xavier, told him about the track already being raised and asked if he still maintained that plugging in a 4 ft track was a 2 hour job. He wouldn't actually answer the question directly, but stated that I had already agreed to pay for 2 hours and that we were done negotiating. It seems to me now that any electrician that takes 2 hours to install 4 ft of track lighting probably needs a new job, or needs to run into an idiot like me every now and then.
They left a huge mess, didn't shorten the flexible wires at all, when I went back tonight, the ceiling fan was only working on high speed and turned off entirely if it was adjusted to a lower speed, and it seems that they did such a
"On this job we were not hired directly by the Member, I took on this job with out professional prints or proper 3 directional measurements. The owner of the building contracted with me and requested a substantial discount from my bid provided, I clearly explain that if I do such a discount I will not be able to do any additions or changes at no cost, and from my experience there is always additions and changes specially when there is not a perfect print. We all agree and signed the contract, plus the member signed for her part and agree on the additions, changes clause.(plus she agree to provide the proper tracks and fan) We worked on this job exactly on the dates and times agreed upon. I have no way of knowing when my employees will be doing what part of the job, they did the installation exactly as I told them following the instructions of the member original conversation with me. Bottom line we did the changes she requested or where needed 3 different days (minutes of each day), the $140 extra where charged where for additions (we have a set price of minimum 1 hr per person,at $70/hr she agree to this amount) Furthermore I decide not to bill her extra for the fittings/connectors we provided plus the additional hanging devices and the new fan control we provided since she provided the wrong kind of fan, plus my time to go meet her. She did pay the bill in full, it was ONLY $40 more than the original estimate. Also after our last day on the job,(after her final payment) we did clean up and installed the proper fan control, the job was approved by the state inspector. She still did not seem to be happy for the additional charge, and threatened to post a bad report, my response was that Angie's list is completely unbiased, and the public will ultimately decide to hire us again. In conclusion the rest of my reports speak for us, we did provide quality service at a fair price and exactly on time."
UPDATE: 4/6/2012
I am appalled at reading the company's response and felt the need to reply. First, updating our service from 100amp to 150 was in the original contract; this was not added later. They knew what they were supposed to do. Second, the owner, Javier, stood in my laundry room and feverishly tried to explain to me how the 50amp subpanel his electrician installed was the same thing as upgrading our service to 150amp. I discovered that neither Haro nor the general contractor had taken out a permit for any of the electrical work, so I phoned the city inspector. When he came out to look at the work, I asked him if the subpanel accomplished the goal of upgrading our home to 150amp - - he said 'no'. Why would I have asked the question if the idea had not been presented to me?! Third, the "deteriorated business relationship" between the general contractor and myself became that way due to Haro's electrician informing me of a comment the construction manager had made to him: that Dave, the constr. mgr. was "disgusted" with me. Fourth, the 150amp upgrade was just something we decided to do for future use. No electrical upgrades were required for my kitchen remodel project. Fifth, another electrician Haro sent out to correct non-code work done the first time (as pointed out by the inspector) said it would've been easy to do the upgrade. No additional lines, underground or otherwise, would've been needed. Haro Electric should have their business license reviewed by the State.
"Our company was not hired by the member, we were contacted and working TIME AND MATERIALS for her general contractor. We are a separate company from the general contractor and have nothing to do with their deteriorated business relationship. Bottom line the general contractor made good, and paid us to complete the job properly (including extra junction boxes to accommodate customer supplied fixtures) and get an approval from the state inspector. I met with the member and explained that the sub-panel is all she needed for the purpose, in no instance I told her is the same as upgrading the complete service to 150A. After we completed the job, the general contractor ask for a quote to upgrade her service, we told him that was not possible with out bringing a new wire under ground rated for 150Amp from the transformer."
Licensing
State Contractor License Requirements
All statements concerning insurance, licenses, and bonds are informational only, and are self-reported. Since insurance, licenses and bonds can expire and can be cancelled, homeowners should always check such information for themselves. To find more licensing information for your state, visit our Find Licensing Requirements page.
*Contact business to see additional licenses.