Bradley Hales from Brothers Roofing has no ethical code of conduct and used Bait-and-Switch and Deceptive Trade Practices on me. I thought I had a “Trusted Roof Company” for my roof replacement until I received my roof “Limited Warranty” paper on January 6, 2012. From “Type/Color of Single: Owens Corning Duration – Colonial Slate” on my “Limited Warranty” paper, at that moment I knew my roof shingles were not the Timberline HD shingles what I had specifically asked, repeatedly confirmed and paid for. I didn’t even know “Owens Corning” was a shingle brand name until that evening. I was deceived. English is not my first language; as a lady I didn’t have any knowledge of roof at that time, but I did have good referrals from my work place and friends, Brothers Roofing was referred to me because of its good reputation and good rating. I had 8 estimates and 5 written proposals prior to Brothers Roofing’s estimate for my roof replacement. Brothers Roofing was the last estimate I had on October 12, 2011. After the first two estimates, I requested to have Timberline High Definition lifetime warranty shingles for my new roof to the rest of seven roof estimate salespersons. I never even gave any of them a chance to sell me another brand of shingle because I wanted to have “apples to apples” comparison. Initially Bradley Hales from Brothers Roofing offered the price of $15,000. After he read two of the proposals that were favorable to me at that time, Mr. Hales offered to match and beat one of these proposals. The proposal Mr. Hales offered to match had a total price quote of $12,600 for Timberline HD shingles with lifetime warranty and, wood replacement at additional cost to owner. Mr. Hales voluntarily offered wood replacement as needed at no additional charge and everything else the same: same price and same type of shingles. To make sure he understood what brand and type of shingle I wanted, I also showed him a set of GAF flyers that has Timberline HD lifetime warranty shingle and other materials. Then, I repeated to confirm the wood replacement as needed no additional charge. He nodded and added that he could use Brothers Roofing’s online coupon, which would take off another $750 for my roof project. Then he asked me to sign a contract right away, I felt being pressured and very uncomfortable. I asked him to write it down everything he had said. In line item# 7 of his proposal, he wrote “TIMBERLINE ARCH SINGLE OR OWENS CORNING LIFETIME”. Because I didn’t know Owens Corning was a brand name of shingles at that time and it was written next to “Lifetime”, I didn’t catch the dirty trick Mr. Hales played on me. He promised to match other proposal for Timberline HD lifetime warranty shingle, and then switched to Owens Corning Duration shingles. It was Bait-and-Switch. In the evening of October 13, 2012, Mr. Hales came to my home for a contract signing. It was total about 10 minutes from the time he walked in to the time he left my house. Before we started the contract, he asked me to add another $300. I asked him why; he said it was for tax. I said the proposal total was $12,600, he didn’t say anything. Before we started getting into and during the contract signing, I repeated several times to him my three key things that must have in the contract: (1) Timberline HD lifetime warranty shingle; (2) total cost $12,600; (3) wood replacement as needed at no additional charge. I wanted to make sure we were on the same page; Mr. Hales was laughing and nodding his head to repeat these key points without any hesitation. I noticed in the contract the total price was $12,600 and there were two “GAF” written in the contract, but I didn’t see “wood replacement as needed no charge” in the contract, I refused to sign and asked him to write it down on the contract. Then he wrote a zero (0) at “an additional charge $____ per square”. Actually I found out later that the two “GAF” on my contract (“GAF NESTNERWOTCH”, “GAF SHINGLE MATE”) were not shingles. On the next page of my contract, he wrote “OWENS CORNING TRUE DEFINITION”. Because I didn’t know that Owens Corning was “shingle” and his handwriting was very poor, I didn’t catch it in my contract. There was no mention of Owens Corning in any of my other proposals from other Roof estimates. I had never doubted the salesperson from a good company that could repeatly promise Timberline HD shingle then switched to some other shingle. It was Deceptive Trade Practices. When I found out my roof shingle had been switched from Timberline HD to Owens Corning Duration (in the evening of Friday on January 6, 2012), I sent an email directly to Mr. John Martindale, the owner of Brothers Roofing. I didn’t receive any response. On January 16, 2012, I requested mediation to resolve the issue privately. What Brothers Roofing did was to try to convince my mediator and me how good Owens Corning Shingles are. Actually I found out later through my research, regular Owens Corning (OC) Duration shingles, which were used on my roof, have a much lower quality and cheaper price compared to OC Duration Premium and/or Timberline HD Lifetime warranty shingle. The latter two kinds of shingles would be equivalent based on their quality and cost. The regular OC Duration shingles should not have been used on my roof at all in the first place. On January 18, 2012, I notified Brothers Roofing that I had to file a complaint. When I filed my complaint with the Maryland Home Improvement Commission (MHIC) on February 24, 2012, the first investigator had a conflict of interest; and then another investigator Mr. William Banks came to ask me to go to consumer protection. Consumer Protection sent back a letter (and cc to MHIC as well) on February 29, 2012 that MHIC would be better able to assist me. On March 6, 2012, MHIC noticed me that “Mr. Banks is not your investigator at this time”. On April 6 and April 7, 2012, I received two official letters from Mr. Banks; both letters were dated March 30, 2012. One letter states and quot;I am the investigator assigned to your complaint and I will be contacting you”; another letter states “your complaint … has been satisfactorily resolved.” Since I emailed those letters and other following up to MHIC’s executive director, who noticed by email that his assistant will contact me, I have never received the contact. My complaint had absolutely not been resolved – satisfactorily or otherwise. And, given that the acknowledgment letter and resolution letter were dated only one day apart, it is clear that absolutely no effort was made to investigate my complaint. On July 27, 2012, I received the 3rd letter from Mr. William Banks at MHIC stating my complaint was closed. On August 2, 2012, the director of Dispute Resolution and Trade Practice at BBB Maryland responded “NO” to my two questions: “Has BBB ever received a complaint against Brothers Services’ salesperson Bradley Hales since 2010?” “Has the BBB ever received a complaint against Brothers Services regarding unfair and/or deceptive trade practices since 2010?” (Is it true? my email
[email protected]) Bradley Hales had been complained for deceptive practice in Angie’s List. During this process, I have also found out that there are other complaints on Angie’s List against Bradley Hales for deceptive practices.