Overall the experience has been a nightmare. While you read this, keep in mind that Joe (the owner of Mold Pro) was unwilling to come out and personally look at what my complaints were. He dug his heels into the ground and tried arguing over technicalities of the contract. The technicalities that he tried arguing are addressed later in this review and blur the lines of ethical behavior. I only asked that he fulfill the scope of what was in the contract and that he stand behind the quality of his work, nothing more. I was blissfully ignorant over the past 3 years thinking that I had a safe house for my family to live in. Once I realized that has been a lie, I offered Joe and his company a chance to make it right. He decided to show his true colors and try to bully me into not holding him accountable. Here is our story: Back in 2016, my wife and I purchased our current house, as part of the sale agreement, we required the seller to eliminate all mold from the attic. They chose Mold Pro. Fast forward to 2019: I work for an energy efficiency company and they wanted to do a video shoot so they could show customers what is involved in a weatherization project. I volunteered my house because Im always interested in being as energy efficient as possible. Prior to the work being done, I had one of the contractors come take a look so he could prepare his team for the work that they would be doing. During his assessment, he pointed out that all the mold in the attic had returned. He said that it would need to be taken care of prior to moving forward with the project.I remembered that the seller of the house provided paperwork that showed the scope of work that was to be completed and that it also came with a 10-year transferrable warranty. I took pictures of the mold and reached out to Mold Pro. My initial interactions with Joe (the owner) were pleasant. He requested a copy of the warranty, pictures of the mold and proof that work was completed to address the initial cause of the mold. I did find it strange that as part of their warranty, they didn’t do their own assessment and document what they felt the original cause was. Either way, it was determined by my home inspection that the cause was bathroom vents being vented to the attic and not the exterior. That issue was resolved at the time of the purchase of the house and I was able to provide Joe the proof.At that point Joe agreed to send his team out to repair the mold under the warranty. Ultimately, they had to reschedule twice due to cold temperatures. That was understandable since this was around the time of the polar vortex and the temperature was in the negatives. I was told that they were going to give me a call on Monday to try to reschedule early in the week. On that Monday I received a text stating their ETA was 10am. Based on our last discussion, he was to call to reschedule for early in the week. Again, not a big deal, my wife was home and she was able to rearrange her plans to allow the Mold Pro team into our house and I didn’t want to risk rescheduling for a 3rd time.I was wanting to be home during the visit because my weatherization contractor had pointed out that there were several areas missed in the attic on their initial visit back in 2016. I asked Joe to have his team pull back some of the insulation near the corners to ensure they can treat the entire roof deck. I told him not to worry about putting the insulation back neatly because it was going to have to be removed for health and safety purposes anyways. He had agreed via text message. My wife said the technician that arrived was very nice and polite and he finished up at our house very quickly.I went ahead and scheduled to have the weatherization contractor, video crew and members from my company’s marketing department move forward with our project on Thursday 2/14. The contractor went up into the attic and started removing the insulation so they could begin the air sealing part of the video. Once they got further away from the attic hatch, they noticed that there were several areas that were never addressed on the overhead decking and joints, even areas that weren’t covered by insulation. The crew was able to finish the air sealing part of the job; however, they were not able to add in any insulation until the mold was removed. I had approximately 12 people at my house that all had to stop work because the mold was never properly removed by Mold Pro.I reached back out to Joe and provided him with the pictures my weatherization contractor took and let him know that they couldn’t continue until his team addressed this. This is where the interactions with Joe went south real fast. His response was “We will not be back”. I tried calling him and left him a voicemail letting him know that I needed to move quickly because my attic no longer has insulation and I have a 3 month old and 4 year old living in the house and it is the middle of winter. He eventually responded back and there was a ton of back and forth. I ultimately had move forward with having a different mold removal contractor come out to do the work because I could tell Joe wasn’t interested in trying to resolve the situation. Here is a list of Joe’s arguments: • That I am making assumptions on what was agreed to in the contract between the seller and Mold Pro o I have the signed contract, it lists mold removal from 880 sq ft of the decking and joists (which covers the entire sq ft of my attic)o All I was asking for was that the original contract be followed o There was no documentation on the signed contract that stated the job was only partially completed due to any circumstances o I see the fact that he billed for the entire square footage but missed approximately 2-3 feet along the entire perimeter as well as some other larger areas as not only an ethical issue but a legal issue. • Joe stated that he was never contracted to remove 100% of the mold in my attic o This didn’t seem like an ethical statement, why would anyone ask for only some of the mold to be removed? o Again, I was only asking that he remove 100% of the mold on the decking and joists which is in the contract • Joe stated asked me to point out on the contract where it list that they would move insulation to get to mold o He was correct that the contract doesn’t specifically state that; however, it also does not state that he wouldn’t move insulation. o I also have in text message that they said they would on their return visit. o I asked my trusted mold removal contractor that came out to complete if it was industry standard to not address overhead decking in the corners that may be covered by insulation. He said it would be an ethical issue for a contractor to not treat those areas. The trusted contractor also explained that there is a rake-like tool that is used for instances like that to ensure a proper and complete job. • Joe stated that I was negligent in getting the root cause of the mold in my attic resolved. o This is a false assumption, Joe did not personally come out to see the issues that I was referencing. o No root causes were pointed out in any of Mold Pro’s documents. o I was proactive and followed the advice of the home inspector and had the bathroom vents terminated to the exterior of the house. o Since there was about a 2-3 foot of untreated decking and joists around the perimeter of my attic, that was the likely cause of it coming back • Joe stated that his team is only able to treat accessible areas o I agree and wouldn’t argue that they should have treated inaccessible areas o I asked my trusted mold removal contractor if there were any barriers in my attic that would have prevented accessibility and he was adamant that all areas were accessible. If you have made it this far into my review, I would like to remind you of what I stated at the beginning, Joe was unwilling to come out and personally look at my complaint. I sent him the pictures and tried to get him to look at it from an unbiased perspective. I have over 20 screenshots of our text conversation and have asked him to ensure all future communication with me is in writing. He has