
Scottish Home Improvements
About us
Scottish Home Improvements are James Hardie Preferred Remodellers. We install around 200,000 square feet of James Hardie Colorplus Siding per year. Angies list members should contact Joe Croke for preferred pricing on siding and windows. James Hardie contractors.
Business highlights
Services we offer
Alside Windows, Colorplus Siding, Decks, Everest Windows, Exterior Remodel, Fiber Cement Siding, Gutters, Interior Remodel, James Hardie Fiber Cement Siding, James Hardie Siding, Lap siding, Patio Covers, Pella Windows, Replacement siding, Roofs, Sheffield Windows, Siding, Siding repair, Steel Siding, Stucco., Vinyl Siding, Vinyl windows, Windows, Wood Windows
Amenities
Emergency Services
Yes
Free Estimates
Yes
Accepted Payment Methods
- CreditCard
Number of Stars | Image of Distribution | Number of Ratings |
---|---|---|
58% | ||
25% | ||
0% | ||
17% | ||
0% |
Bitterly disappointing. Distressing. Infuriating. This describes our experience with Scottish Home Improvements.
We hired them to remove vinyl and original painted wood siding from our 1939 house and to install new James Hardie siding. We hired them, the highest bid, because they are certified James Hardie installers and because they are "lead certified." I told Scottish my background was public health and that handling lead properly was very important to us. We thought they were serious about lead paint hazards, and we assumed they'd do things right. Not so much.
Despite a positive lead test and a "lead fee per EPA" added to our contract, after one day of old wood siding removal, the ground outside was covered with paint chips. Investigation of lead safe practices online revealed that we should have received a pamphlet on renovations and lead BEFORE they began working and that pretty much nothing on our job site resembled what I was reading about a "lead job".
Shocked and super dang mad, I filled out the "report a lead violation" form on the EPA's website, but before I hit send, my husband and I sat down and considered all the consequences. Our house had 1/4 to 1/3 of its siding removed. What would happen if we filed a complaint with EPA? Might they stop the job? How long might we be left with a house without siding?
Second, after reading the fine print (and it literally is written in ridiculously small print) of our contract with Scottish, we realized that we had signed away most of our rights. Scottish retains the right to sue its clients, but by signing their contract, the client relinquishes all right to sue them. More importantly, we couldn't 'fire' them. According to the contract, they could find us in breach of contract and sue us if we kicked them off the job. We had to let them finish, and since we had to let them finish the job, we discussed the possibility that they would find a way to retaliate if we informed the EPA.
Finally, we had a contractor scheduled immediately after our siding job to install an upstairs bathroom. We had no fully functional bathroom at the time, and we were desperate to get things in order. One thing hinged on the other: If our siding job got messed up, the bathroom job got messed up, and if that happened, our contractor wouldn't earn the income he and his crew were planning to earn in March. Plus, we'd be left with our semi-functional bathroom. We felt like no matter which decision we made, WE came out the losers.
So, with regret, we decided that the risk of retaliation, the risk of being left with a partially un-sided house, and the risk of our bathroom contractor getting caught in the crossfire was too great, and we did not report the lead violations to the EPA. Instead I contacted Scottish and told them how furious we were. I told them there was NO WAY we were paying nearly $1,000 extra for a lead job. Our job was not treated as a lead job, they contaminated our property, so how did they dare to charge us extra for a "lead job"?
Too little too late, the salesperson said she'd send the lead pamphlet to us. (federal law says they had to do it BEFORE the job). I told them to clean up the mess they made and AT LEAST put down plastic to catch paint chips going forward. I also took loads of photos documenting the work site and the paint all over the ground. For several days after I complained, they made an extra effort and even cleaned up at the end of the day. The project manager said he'd replace our exposed weed barrier that they'd covered in paint chips.
We kind of decided that if they cleaned up their mess and tried to prevent further spread of paint chips, we'd let it go, as far as the EPA was concerned. But, toward the end of the job, they started being less careful again. Then they finished, and when the dumpster on our driveway (right outside our entry door) was removed, we found the driveway was covered in paint chips. We spent a good couple hours cleaning up the paint chips on the driveway and around our door to avoid tracking lead paint into our house. We also discovered that when Scottish replaced our weed barrier, as they'd promised, instead of cleaning up the paint chips around the house first, they just put new weed barrier on top of the paint chips to cover them up.
Upon seeing the mess on my driveway and the covered up paint chips, my fury returned, and with the job finished, I notified the EPA. I turned over all my photos and forwarded email. It's too late for us, but I'm hopeful there will be some sort of fine involved to teach these people that they can't just play games like this and decide to handle lead safely only when it suits them.
To add insult to injury: the contract we signed required us to allow them to place a sign advertising themselves outside our house. So despite our fury, to avoid being held in breach of contract, we had to shut up and advertise for them for the duration.
Our experience with the remodeling division, which handled the rebuilding of our front porch and building a 45 sq. foot landing off our back sliding door, was not as positive. There were numerous delays on both projects and our project manager, Wes, was not as responsive or proactive. We wanted to have the same company handle all the exterior work, but Scottish's performance was uneven between the two divisions. We paid a premium to have all the work done by one company and it was frustrating that the front porch/back landing projects did not give us the value of a seamless work flow that we were hoping our higher cost would buy us.
When I got frustrated with the delays, I spoke to the staff at the main office and they were as responsive as possible and finally the job was done. I would recommend the siding division without hesitation. When it comes to the remodeling division, I have some reservations.
"Member thanks for the report. I hope you had a good experience with the company you eventually chose to do your siding. I just want to be clear with anyone reading this report that they understand that Scottish Home Improvements did not carry out any work in this instance. Best wishes Martin Faith, President, Scottish Home Improvements."
Licensing
State Contractor License Requirements
All statements concerning insurance, licenses, and bonds are informational only, and are self-reported. Since insurance, licenses and bonds can expire and can be cancelled, homeowners should always check such information for themselves. To find more licensing information for your state, visit our Find Licensing Requirements page.
*Contact business to see additional licenses.