We were first instructed
to contact Mr. Appliance through LG, the manufacturer of our
refrigerator. Our refrigerator was noted to have stopped cooling on
Saturday Jul 18. After calling LG, they instructed us to call Mr.
Appliance, because they are listed has having the only LG certified technicians
in our area. An online service request on Mr. Appliance?s website was
made on Jul 18, followed up by a phone call on Monday Jul 20. A service
person from Mr. Appliance came that same day in the afternoon to run a
diagnostic check on the refrigerator unit.
The person who came out
diagnosed the problem as being a faulty or broken compressor, which would need
to be replaced. Due to the 3-4 hour labor time for
installing a compressor, the charge was estimated at around $500. Mr.
Appliance required a $300 deposit at that time. When I finally came home
later that night, I noticed no paperwork left at our residence indicating
the person?s name, or an invoice amount.
Earlier that day, a
representative from Mr. Appliance?s of Delaware?s call center stated that the
part should arrive by Wednesday of that week, and that it should be
installed by end of week. Unfortunately, the part did not arrive until
the Monday of the following week, and as such, Mr. Appliance returned
on July 28 with a different service person.
This different person did not install a compressor but instead performed a leak check. However, no informed consent was given to me over the
phone, to my nanny, or my wife. My nanny was pressured into
signing a waiver (Mr. Appliance insisted that she sign the form and
would not allow her to tend to our 12 month old son unless she did so. )
Therefore, she reluctantly signed it even though she was not authorized to do
so by us, the owners. Moreover, no explanation was given to her
as to what were the ramifications of the process. Just as he was
leaving, my wife arrived at the house, and he stated that he performed a ?leak
check??he also stated that the fridge should cool down in 6 hours and would
work normally by this evening. He also said that in 2-3 months, it?ll
start to lose its cooling ability, and to call Mr Appliance to come out and
find where the leak was.
Later that night, the
refrigerator still was warm?with no cooling. I called Mr. Appliance, and
complained about multiple issues:
-lack of informed
consent
-lack of knowledge about
what repairs were done
-conflicting statements
of what service was provided (compressor installation or leak check)
-conflicting diagnoses
by two different people at Mr Appliance (leak or compressor problem). If the compressor was not the
problem, why order the part thereby causing the delay in service?
-using our warranty on
our Fridge to order a compressor from LG, without installation of the compressor.
Mr Appliance showed up again
on 7/30/15 to ?re-service? the refrigerator. They spent 15 minutes at our
residence. He said that there was a defective valve and that he needs a
new one.
Mr. Appliance then left our
residence on 7/30/15. We received an invoice later that night via
email. The invoice contained a non-recognizable signature, which did not
match myself, my wife?s or my nanny. I spoke to my nanny, who was the
only person home, and she did not sign anything.
As of this point it had
been over 10 days since the initial call. We still have a non-functioning
refrigerator. We have yet to even have a diagnosis or an explanation.
Secondly, I have major
doubts about the diagnostic ability of the people who have come out from Mr.
Appliance of Delaware in regard to LG refrigerator repair. There are some
serious flaws and in the logical reasoning regarding the ?services? provided:
-If there was a
compressor failure, there would be zero cooling from the unit, but there is
some cooling that is discernible and measurable (with thermometer) near the
freezer compartment.
-If there was a leak,
again there would be zero cooling and it would have been a slow process where
we noticed poor cooling performance, and ultimately resulted in compressor
failure.
-In other words, the two
diagnoses proposed by Mr. Appliance
Delaware are not plausible, and raise high suspicion of doubt.
At this point, we have
received implausible diagnoses from Mr. Appliance of Delaware
County's service people who are more inclined to draw out the repair
process and not diagnose or fix the refrigerator and are really
making ?guesses? to what may be wrong. Moreover, we did not receive
informed consent with regard to the service work and did not them permission to do a ?leak check?. Pressuring our nanny into signing a form
or waiver is not the same as informed consent.
This ?leak check?
resulted in a piercing valve being placed by Mr. Appliance for which we did not
authorize nor did we receive informed consent. We were informed
of this only following the procedure just as he was leaving.
This upsets me in many
ways. These piercing valves should only be placed as a ?last
resort?. Most refrigerator malfunctions are caused by the
failure of electrical components. An insufficient Freon charge is one of the
last things to consider when troubleshooting a refrigerator that does not cool.
It is unlikely that your refrigerator will suddenly start leaking just sitting
in your kitchen unless it is manual defrost and you recently removed the ice
from the freezer compartment by using a knife, screwdriver, chisel, or pry bar
and punctured the aluminum evaporator coil or an incompetent service person
installed piercing-valves that are leaking. This is also corroborated by
multiple professional sources.
Keep in mind that we
have an infant at home who takes breastmilk that will spoil if not
refrigerated, in addition to a four year old with special needs, and no
main refrigerator, which has been quite a burden for our family. We could
have had other options, but went with Mr. Appliance because of their contract
with LG.
In summary here are the issues that we have had with Mr. Appliance:
1) lack of informed consent
2) placement of a piercing valve without permission (irreversible process that
makes us reliant on Mr. Appliance for Freon in the future)
3) delay in repair
related to conflicting diagnoses
4) use of our manufacturer?s warranty to order
of a part (compressor) that was never installed
5) inaccurate communication
6)
unknown signature on some of the work orders.
7) missing invoices