This member’s complaint is an attempt to deceive Angie’s List members. “I will be assessing my damages over the next few days and will be proposing a fair resolution to the question of returning your deposit.” is the offer that was made to this client on 3 occasions. In doing these Mold remediation projects, we sometimes make purchases and/or provide deposits and/or contractual commitments for materials and/or labor that is not returnable, non-refundable and/or the breach of contract might result in litigation. My advisors, including the State of Arizona Registrar of Contractors investigator, advised me to wait and see if I had incurred any damages before I considered return any of the client’s deposit money. What happen? Let me begin by saying that Moldex has been in business for over 13 years, the company has been highly successful with 90% of our business coming from referrals from our past clients, we are the only company in our industry to have received Angie’s List Super Service Awards – let alone for the last 2 years in a row, we has received several Honor Roll Awards, were featured in the Pages of Happiness section of their magazine in June of 2013, we have no complaints with the State of Arizona Registrar of Contractors, we are an A+ Accredited by the Better Business Bureau of Northern Arizona, we are listed in Ethical Arizona, nor have we never had a formal complaint or have we been named in litigation. This complaint is a first, so please excuse me if this reply is long winded. What is unusual about this project is that I typically do not take a deposit. My past client will tell you that I opt for payment in full after the project has been completed and the client is satisfied. This is a reflection of my belief and practice of treating all people with honesty, integrity & fairness – and all I ask is to be treated the same. The deposit was requested when because it became very evident that this client did not share this same belief. Ordinarily, I would have politely declined this project, but I stuck with it because there was an innocent “tenant” claiming that her health was being adversely affected by living in this home. (I recently found that I had been played for a fool… the “tenant” was actually the client’s business partner and stepdaughter.) One of the many examples of this client’s deceit is the fact that I submitted 2 bids on this project; the 1st bid (dated June 1, 2013), that the client is loosely quoting from, was made null and void when he rejected it on June 2, 2013. As proof, I have his email rejecting the bid by requesting that it be revised to exclude all finishing repair items such as drywall, insulation, texture, primer, paint, etc., because his “guy” was going to do these repairs. The client acknowledged receipt of this new 2nd bid in an email that he sent on June 3, 2013. Both bids called for the remediation and repair of the wall located at the entry corridor, just inside the Master Bedroom, and described as the “Master Bedroom/Shower Wall” because it shares a common wall with the Master Bathroom Shower Stall. This wall was flagged when, during the initial “walk thru” (the tenant was not present) the client pointed out this wall because he feared that a crack in the Master Bathroom Bathtub may have allowed water to enter into the wall, possibly having caused Mold. The wall looked fine, there were no water staining and the paint was in very good shape. I inspected the bathtub, ran the water and after taking numerous moisture readings, concluded that the wall was dry and the Fiber Glass bathtub merely had a superficial surface crack that had not leaking . The client then stated that when he bought the home, there was a “small area” of Mold on the lower wall area that his “guy” had cleaned up bleach prior to painting. A test sample indicated the presence of Mold, and based upon the standing at the wall and physically indicating the area of the wall area that was affected prior to the cleaning and painting; this area was included in the bids. 15 days later, in the late afternoon of June 18, 2013, I received a call from his “tenant” informing me that they had found a contractor that was willing to do the project for less money. The tenant requested that I either lower my price or supply & install free cement board in the Master Bathroom Shower. Apparently, they had now decided to do a Master Bathroom Shower Stall Renovation. The call ended soon after I informed the tenant that I had nothing to do with a Master Bathroom Shower Renovation, that I would not be willing to do either drop my price or supply and install any free cement board, the client had already accepted the contract and that the time to negotiate had already come and gone since the project was slated to start the following morning. Later that evening, I received an urgent request to call the client. Since the project was slated to begin immediately the following morning (and I did not immediately get the message) I called him late that evening. When I spoke with the client, the conversation was a continuation of the theme of getting something for nothing, but now the client upped the ante by now insisting that I had agreed to rip out the entire Master Bathtub Shower Stall area, remediating the area, then renovate the entire Master Bathroom Shower Stall by supplying and installing a New Bathtub and Shower Surround. I pointed out that that this was not in my bid and it would cost thousands of additional dollars in order to do a project of this nature. I suggested that since there was nothing wrong with the fiber glass bathtub, other than a cosmetic surface crack, he might consider having it repaired for a fraction of the cost by an onsite bathtub repair company. The client said “I doubt that” and informed me that I was fired. I asked the client who the contractor that under bid me was? He replied that there was no other contractor, and after discussing his tenants earlier demands, swore to he had no one, and effectively called her a liar. As you can see by his complaint, his was once again, not being truthful. In spite of the client’s sheer dishonesty, and against all advice, I responded to the client’s emailed, and on 3 occasions offering that “I will be assessing my damages over the next few days and will be proposing a fair resolution to the question of returning your deposit.” I made this statement because, in our industry, we sometimes make purchases and provide deposits for materials and the labor of subcontractors that are non-returnable, non-refundable, or cancellable with penalty. My legal advisor advised me to wait and see if I had incurred any damages before I considered return any of the deposit money. In closing, I would like to state that I don’t ordinarily air my laundry in public, but I felt that Angie’s List members had a right to know all the particulars and circumstances. As a believer in transparency, and in an effort to clear my company’s good name, I will provide unedited copies of both contracts and all emails to any Angie’s List member that makes the request, in order for them to decide for themselves.