Response from More Than A Carpenter, LLC
First of all, the individual making this report was never a customer of mine. His wife approached me about building a carport/deck with the stipulation that her husband "had had his chance" to build the addition and, for five years had a number of excuses for not getting it done. She was embarrassed by the appearance of her house and ashamed to have people see it. She had approached an architect about a design and, when drawings were submitted, the husband had determined that "he didn't need an architect" and it never got built. So, when she approached me, he was determined that it would not get built by a contrator and she was determined that I would build it. Not a good basis to begin a business relationship but, it was clear that this was her job because she was tired of waiting. The strain between them was apparent daily. So, what were his complaints with our work? Almost exclusively with the direction of "growth rings" in the lumber. He insisted that growth rings in all rafters had to face the same direction (when prodded, he stated that all growth rings should face "north" (seriously!)). His roof deck was to be made of T&G 1x6's ("none of that plywood crap in his addition"!). We used boards with V-grooves on the face side and it looked great. But he noted (repeatedly) that the growth rings were upside down on several boards. When I pointed out that the V-groove determined the top or bottom and that I couldn't turn the boards over he suggested that I use them on the other side of the garage. When I pointed out that upside down on one side is upside down on the other too, he suggested that I return the (special-ordered) lumber and get the growth rings right. He didn't like that we got dirt on his grass. We dug footing holes and left the dirt near the holes to back-fill and distribute under the 18" high deck. He wanted us to carry the dirt 100 feet down hill to an area he wanted landscaped and brought back up the hill if we needed it later rather than leave it on his grass. He didn't like puddles in a bricked-in (and as yet incomplete) garden area. When we pointed out that his 3" plastic snap-together gutters were leaking and that 100% of the water in the garden was from the leaky part of the roof rather than from any area that was a part of our construction agreement he stated that water never pooled there before even though we never touched the gutters. Every day I would build to the spec's established in the architectural plan, to the building code in our jurisdiction and after extensive discussions with his wife--my customer. In the evenings he would have some comment that she would try to address the following morning. When I pointed out that it was done according to the plans she would say that she couldn't read the plans and didn't know that was going to be like that (even though she had approved several iterations of the plans). When I told her that I had to follow established building codes and the plans approved by the County, she'd respond that they didn't care about the Building Code "out here", that they'd "take care of the inspector" if he had a problem. To address his specific graded comments: Overall an "F". He was determined to cause problems before we started and was determined that his wife would not be happy with the project when it was complete. Price an "F". He had been determined to build this himself so any contractor was over priced. And there was no comment from her (my customer) about the price when the contract was presented. Responsiveness a "C". I was under no obligation to respond to him at any time, he was not my customer. I was not obligated to build to standards not approved by my contract, the Building Code or the plans they had provided. I was not responsive to him. I think I was extremely responsive to his wife's desires. Punctuality a "C". He was so abrasive in dealings with my employees and three subcontractors on the job that his wife and I determined that we would not arrive at work until after he had left for his job and that my subcontractors should not be exposed to his tirades at all. She provided his work schedule and we worked opposing hours so, from his point of view, we appeared somewhat un-timely. But we worked 8 hours a day for 4 1/2 weeks each and every day having to put up with mostly ridiculous complaints and unfounded allegations, rarely working when he was home. Professionalism an "F". He didn't want a contractor, he interfered in every decision his wife and I made, he employed unlicensed "friends" to do parts of the job we had not contracted to do (gutters, painting) etc and was satisfied with their "good old boy" demeanor. I don't feel he is qualified to determine professionalism. Bottom line? I haven't been paid for the final 10% of the job performed after I gave more than contracted for, with a totally unfair power-struggle between husband and wife, with a somewhat limited work schedule and we finished 5 days ahead of schedule. I liked the job we did, we have heard positive responses from neighbors, from two architects involved in the project and from each and every one of the sub-contractors and have secured work from the electrician and the lead architect since completion of the carport. We have used photos of the work in our advertising without hesitation. And we still await final payment. I'll ask you to determine whether this client's vague and non-specific report is a valid Angies' List complaint or whether it is another example of his belligerence.